I dont' care about whether a candidate comes to my state- I can read issues
without a visit or a really misleading and mudslinging television
commerical.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Corrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: Voting (Re: jihad for kids .. wheeee)


> Then what would happen is that candidates would only campaign in states
> that are heavily populated and concentrate on the urban areas because
> that's where most people live.  States without large cities or
> populations would be essentially be forgotten and not represented.  That
> would exclude most states west of the Mississippi and east of the west
> coast states (Cali, Ore., Wash, etc.).  Candidates don't even go to
> Hawaii or Alaska anymore because of cost and small electorates. I'm not
> too comfortable with that idea.
>
> Michael Corrigan
> Programmer
> Endora Digital Solutions
> 1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200
> Lombard, IL 60148
> 630-627-5055 ext.-136
> 630/627-5255 Fax
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Beth Fleischer
>   To: CF-Community
>   Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 4:01 PM
>   Subject: Re: Voting (Re: jihad for kids .. wheeee)
>
>
>   H.
>   I hate the electoral college.  It means that there is no point in my
> voting
>   in a presidential election in alaska.  I might as well flush my vote
> down
>   the toilet.  Its supposedly a throwback from a time where the "common
> man"
>   wasnt' considered intelligent or informed enough to vote for himself.
> This
>   concept offends me.
>
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 7:56 AM
>   Subject: RE: Voting (Re: jihad for kids .. wheeee)
>
>
>   > Are we going to debate the Electoral College system now?
>   >
>   > I'm a strong believer in the EC. It allows less urban states to have
> their
>   > voice be heard.
>   >
>   > And every vote does count because the EC votes are cast according to
> how
>   > votes are cast in each state.
>   >
>   > BTW: Aren't you a candidate for president?  And you don't vote for
>   > president? Ummm .... I may be changing my vote.
>   >
>   > H.
>   >
>   >
>   > -----Original Message-----
>   > From: Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:33 AM
>   > To: CF-Community
>   > Subject: Voting (Re: jihad for kids .. wheeee)
>   >
>   >
>   > > Winning is the mandate to rule.  In a representative government,
> that's
>   > all
>   > > you need.
>   > >
>   > > Getting a majority of the votes (in a three-way election) is
> irrelevant.
>   > > Getting a majority of all registered voters is even more
> irrelevant.
>   > >
>   > > I don't really get you're point, however.  What does this have to
> do
>   with
>   > > democracies being careful?  There is no democratic code that says
> all
>   > people
>   > > must vote.  In fact, not voting is a form of voting. Furthermore,
> I
>   don't
>   > > want all people to vote. Too many people who are ill-informed vote
>   already
>   > > any way.  Of course, that's their choice, but I don't believe
> democracy
>   > > suffers when people choose not to vote.  The nice thing about a
> free
>   > society
>   > > is that you can choose not to participate in the civic process if
> that's
>   > > what floats your boat. People should be free to choose that option
>   without
>   > > being made out to be cretins.
>   >
>   > I don't vote in presidential elections because I don't agree with
> how they
>   > are run.
>   >
>   > The saying that "Every vote counts!" is a lie.
>   >
>   > T.
>   >
>   > >
>   > > H.
>   > >
>   > >
>   > >
>   > > -----Original Message-----
>   > > From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   > > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:25 AM
>   > > To: CF-Community
>   > > Subject: RE: jihad for kids .. wheeee
>   > >
>   > >
>   > > I see what you are saying but I do worry that there is a dangerous
>   > > undercurrent lurking in the background there. Like maybe we could
> just
>   ask
>   > > them what they think about it? Otherwise it is simply a case of a
>   dominant
>   > > culture imposing it's values on everyone else. Yes, it might be
> from the
>   > > best motivations, but I think you could see the arrogance there.
>   > > Furthermore, I think you are on very dangerous ground with your
>   assertion
>   > > that "A government that is formed from a mandate from the masses
> (and
>   not
>   > > from some farcical aquatic ceremony) is the only way to go."
> Again,
>   > imposing
>   > > a morality and world view on others. Who is to say that a
> benevolent
>   > > dictatorship is not a better way to live?
>   > >
>   > > Also, I think we who live in 'democratic' countries should be very
>   > careful.
>   > > After all, is it not true that less than half the population of
> the US
>   > voted
>   > > in the last election, and arguably less than half of those who did
>   > actually
>   > > voted for Bush? Hardly a mandate to rule?
>   > >
>   > > will
>   > >
>   > > -----Original Message-----
>   > > From: Lon Lentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   > > Sent: 15 February 2002 23:32
>   > > To: CF-Community
>   > > Subject: RE: jihad for kids .. wheeee
>   > >
>   > >
>   > >
>   > >   I will never accept the premise that "correct" and "right" are
>   > > subjective. They are not.
>   > >
>   > >   Killing is not necessarily wrong. Murder is wrong. Completely
>   > > different. If killing is "wrong", then why do we hire "cops", give
> them
>   > > badges and guns, and allow them to "kill" in our name? Why do we
> let the
>   > > state "kill" in our name? Why do we let the US military "kill" in
> our
>   > > name? There is no subjectiveness here. There is only absolute.
>   > >
>   > >   I am not in anyway trying to suggest that we shove our western
> ideals
>   > > down their throats. A government that is formed from a mandate
> from the
>   > > masses (and not from some farcical aquatic ceremony) is the only
> way to
>   > > go. That is absolute. However they choose to do it.
>   > >
>   > >   Proper human behavior is right and just. No matter where you
> live. No
>   > > matter what religion you follow. No matter your ethnic background.
>   > >
>   > >   Would you suggest that the female castrations that go on in
> Africa,
>   > > could in some way, be "right" or "correct" for those people? I
> don't
>   > > care what kind of society they have, that is wrong.
>   > >
>   > >
>   > > > -----Original Message-----
>   > > > From: chris.alvarado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   > > > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 5:01 PM
>   > > > To: CF-Community
>   > > > Subject: Re: jihad for kids .. wheeee
>   > > >
>   > > >
>   > > > no I'm suggesting exactly what I stated.
>   > > >
>   > > > Absolutes are absolutely wrong.
>   > > >
>   > > > case in point:
>   > > >
>   > > > Killing is wrong.
>   > > >
>   > > > Killing in self defense, is that wrong?
>   > > >
>   > > > most people would tend to say no, if the choice is kill or be
> killed,
>   > > and
>   > > > that is the only way, then killing in self defense is not
> "wrong",
>   > > which
>   > > > completely contradicts the first statement: 'killing is wrong'.
>   > > Killing is
>   > > > killing no matter how pretty you try to paint it.
>   > > >
>   > > > "right" and "wrong" is all a matter of perception.
>   > > >
>   > > > believing that something is right or wrong does not make it so.
>   > > >
>   > > > I believe that the events that occurred on 9/11 and some of the
> events
>   > > > thereafter were "wrong" but that does not make it universally
> so.
>   > > >
>   > > > Who put you, or me for that matter in charge of dictating what
> is
>   > > right or
>   > > > wrong?
>   > > >
>   > > > Freedom is not just about living the way you want to live, it is
>   > > > about being
>   > > > able to also acknowledge the way others choose to live whether
> you
>   > > agree
>   > > > with it or not.
>   > > >
>   > > > Unconventional thought? perhaps, but this country's ideals were
>   > > founded on
>   > > > what was considered to be unconventional / 'unpopular' thinking.
>   > > >
>   > > > in short, what is right for you, may not be right for others,
> I'm
>   > > > not saying
>   > > > that about freedom or any one thing in particular. I'm saying,
> in
>   > > general.
>   > >
>   > >
>   > >
>   >
>   >
>
> 
______________________________________________________________________
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to