> Evolution or Adaptation? Have they created new species with new > characteristics that are unable to breed with their ancestors, or their > decedents?
Adaptation is part of Evolution. The process of evolution involves adaptation, it does not all result in new species. You really should try to read up on some science. > > Missing link, in what way? There are plenty, for horses, whales, people > > dogs etc. > > The missing link that took us from non-living to living. That then moved us > towards what we are today. Why did we evolve past Kudzu which seems to be > the most efficient form of life on the planet. How did we go from simple > organisms, to complex organisms with multiple types of cells doing different > things. How did we become cognitive? > Evolution doesn't have an answer for > that. Evolution doesn't seek to explain that. > > You are not very familiar with the biological sciences if you can make > > your foregoing statements. You are simply demonstrating a profound > > ignorance of biology. > > I am familiar with, from a biology standpoint you have to use evolution to > show how things operate. However it doesn't answer the question of why or > how, only what. > > Creationism answers the questions of why and how. It is a very simple answer > which makes it very easy to believe. Why? Because God wanted it so. How? > Because God made it so. ah yes, the God of the Gaps argument. God did anything we can't explain via science. the gaps are getting smaller. atoms used to be smallest, god filled in the rest. protons, neutrons and electrons used to be smallest, god filled in the rest. quarks, god filled in the rest meson, boson, etc. ....and cue the God exists outside arguments in five...four... three... > Evolution as a tool to teach biology is great. But it cannot answer my > questions. If that is by choice then great, stop comparing it to > creationism. Evolution does not, I say again, does not compare itself to Creationism. Creationists, ID adherents and etc., compare Creationism to Evolution. They always shout about how wrong Evolution is, yet never seem to be able to produce even the smallest amount of evidence that supports Creation. please, feel free to be the first. and cue the Irreducable Complexity argument in five... four... three... > Creationist can accept evolution and not throw away their beliefs, but you > have to go back to explain things that evolution cannot. And the mind of geehodee again. -- will "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that would just be unacceptable." - Carrie Fisher ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create Web Applications With ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2. Build powerful, scalable RIAs. Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJS Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:234100 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
