1. The great oracle
 1.a It must be wonderful to have the ability to see into the future
and/or to be such a great military planner.
 1.b You've never been correct to date on any of your predictions
 1.c Are you cut-n-pasting from tmp.com?

2. yada yada
 2.a you're constant whining about the bad war and the bad president
is worse then listening to my four year old complaining about sharing
toys with her friends.
 2.b doesn't matter what happens, until a liberal is in the Whitehouse
you will whine like a baby.

3. You keep mentioning Darfur
 3.a Do you thing the UN's actions in Darfur is insufficient?
 3.b You supported Kerry's idea that the UN should control the worlds
armies, has that view changed?

4. Why do you number your points?
 4.a You just learned outlines in school
 4.b you think it looks professional
 4.c all of the above


On 5/11/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (1.) Iraq policy is an issue about leadership.
>
>       (1.1) We don't have the military capacity for the mission we've
> taken on.  The President should've considered that possibility up
> front rather than firing the generals that brought it up.  He
> should've "listened to the generals".
>
>       (1.2) Iraq is not question is not war, there is no war; there's
> only a security issue for a Middle Eastern country which makes their
> need no different than, say, Darfur.  We've been there long enough to
> compensate them for Bush's fuck up.  At this point we're simply their
> security bitch.
>
>       (1.3) If we're going to continue in Iraq, then we'll need more
> troops.  If we can't get them by asking for volunteers, then we need a
> draft.  If we're unwilling start a draft, then we need a policy
> change.
>
>      (1.4) Bush's policy is on its last possible leg: Patraeus, and
> the deadline is September.  "The surge" won't work due to a simple
> fact: security in Baghdad is not an obstacle to solving the Iraq
> problem.
>
>      (1.5) The are only 2 solutions to the Iraq Problem:
>            (1.5.1) Level it.  Requires no Iraqi cooperation.
>            (1.5.2) Bring in 500,000 troops who can stay a minimum of
> 50 years and whose mission is to secure the borders and every town and
> city within.  Requires majority Iraqi support which, at this point,
> looks like we're losing.
>
> CONCLUSION: Begin a phased withdrawal immediately.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJP

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:234537
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to