I don't want a Liberal in the White House. I want someone who has some foresight in regards to what is best for this country. I find it very conveniently coincidental that two industries most associated by the President (oil) and Vice-President (Military services and supply) are the ones that have faired the best during their administration. I wonder what motivated them to push for this war. Because I don't see the justification, especially when the time line for the initiation of the war is taken into consideration.
Sam wrote: > 1. The great oracle > 1.a It must be wonderful to have the ability to see into the future > and/or to be such a great military planner. > 1.b You've never been correct to date on any of your predictions > 1.c Are you cut-n-pasting from tmp.com? > > 2. yada yada > 2.a you're constant whining about the bad war and the bad president > is worse then listening to my four year old complaining about sharing > toys with her friends. > 2.b doesn't matter what happens, until a liberal is in the Whitehouse > you will whine like a baby. > > 3. You keep mentioning Darfur > 3.a Do you thing the UN's actions in Darfur is insufficient? > 3.b You supported Kerry's idea that the UN should control the worlds > armies, has that view changed? > > 4. Why do you number your points? > 4.a You just learned outlines in school > 4.b you think it looks professional > 4.c all of the above > > > On 5/11/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> (1.) Iraq policy is an issue about leadership. >> >> (1.1) We don't have the military capacity for the mission we've >> taken on. The President should've considered that possibility up >> front rather than firing the generals that brought it up. He >> should've "listened to the generals". >> >> (1.2) Iraq is not question is not war, there is no war; there's >> only a security issue for a Middle Eastern country which makes their >> need no different than, say, Darfur. We've been there long enough to >> compensate them for Bush's fuck up. At this point we're simply their >> security bitch. >> >> (1.3) If we're going to continue in Iraq, then we'll need more >> troops. If we can't get them by asking for volunteers, then we need a >> draft. If we're unwilling start a draft, then we need a policy >> change. >> >> (1.4) Bush's policy is on its last possible leg: Patraeus, and >> the deadline is September. "The surge" won't work due to a simple >> fact: security in Baghdad is not an obstacle to solving the Iraq >> problem. >> >> (1.5) The are only 2 solutions to the Iraq Problem: >> (1.5.1) Level it. Requires no Iraqi cooperation. >> (1.5.2) Bring in 500,000 troops who can stay a minimum of >> 50 years and whose mission is to secure the borders and every town and >> city within. Requires majority Iraqi support which, at this point, >> looks like we're losing. >> >> CONCLUSION: Begin a phased withdrawal immediately. >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create Web Applications With ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2. Build powerful, scalable RIAs. Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJS Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:234542 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
