> Sam wrote: > I didn't read it as Canada's system failed. The entire argument is convoluted logic and meaningless for 2 reasons:
(1.) There will be a limited number of machines no matter the system or country. Why? Because who's going to fund 10,000 cardiac machines if the mean use is 3 per year? (2.) If America didn't exist, then Canada would have to plug the coverage hole, but it does so why should they? That's like saying that the convenience store concept has failed because you can find a larger selection at a grocery store. As for surgeries in India, it ain't just going to be elective surgeries. It's going to open-heart surgery, whatever. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade to ColdFusion 8 and integrate with Adobe Flex http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJP Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:240727 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
