Small incremental changes. As for the eye, consider this, what rational designer would set things up so that the light sensitive instruments are BEHIND the support network, after going through an opaque Aqueous Humour (the liquid in the eyeball), so that it only gets a fraction of the light that is taken in by the eye. Moreover what rational designer would set up a jury rigged system of the light sensors (the rods and cones of the retina) and put it through such a complicated transduction system so that over 90% of the light that was picked up by the retina is lost.
I could go on, but you need to look at the physiology of the eye more. Besides Darwin in not a good proponent of modern evolutionary theory like Punctuated Equilibrium. He died over a hundred years ago. That would be like having Boyle or his contemporaries commenting on thermohydrodynamics theory. larry -- Larry C. Lyons ColdFusion/Web Developer Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer EBStor.com 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 tel: (703) 393-7930 fax: (703) 393-2659 Web: http://www.ebstor.com http://www.pacel.com email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. -- > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Dawes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 8:17 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Battleground God > > > I'm still wondering why you are both arguing about if God > exists or not. > Personally I believe there is a God, but there is as much scientific > information to prove both evolution and creation to the > untrained thinker. > > I wanted to give the fact boy something to chew on... > > The historical accuracy of the Scriptures (The Bible) is in a class by > itself, far superior to the written records of Egypt, > Assyria, and other > early nations. Archeological confirmations of the Biblical > record have been > almost innumerable in the last century. > > Dr. Nelson Glueck, probably the greatest modern authority on Israeli > archeology, has said: "No archeological discovery has ever > controverted a > Biblical reference. Scores of archeological findings have > been made which > confirm in clear outline or in exact detail historical > statements in the > Bible. And, by the same token, proper evaluation of Biblical > descriptions > has often led to amazing discoveries." > > Unlike most of the evolutionary theories, no scientists have found > fundimental flaws in the Christian Faith. (And please don't > mix faith with > religion - that's a whole other debate!) > > Charles Darwin said, "To suppose that the eye could have been > formed by > natural selection, seems I freely confess, absurd in the > highest degree." > > As for me, I've seen enough of the healing power of 'God' to > convince myself > one million times over. > > I present my case. You present yours. Let's go the the pub > and have a beer! > > God Bless, > Christopher Dawes > Dawes International > > > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
