It's possible. You certainly tend to be correct when you are categorical about something.
However, I think we are talking about different frames of reference. The context of the briefing was the importance of the Business Objects acquisition for the Adobe ecosystem. It was given by the vice president for Product Strategy. It was not a how-to session. Within that frame of reference, he used a graphic reminiscent of the OSI layer model, in which the dev tools -- labeled that way and including CS3 -- were on the layer above LiveCycle. Workbench was not mentioned (tho yes, it exists) but Workbench would be irrlevant to the mainstream press. However I make no claim to expertise in LiveCycle -- at all -- and yes I will be checking on this. Would have anyway. On 10/6/07, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ** Private ** wrote: > > I didn't say it was a dev tool, Jochem. I said that it is the > > foundation for these dev tools, architectually. This per the press > > briefing at MAX. > > I'm sure you misunderstood something there. LC is not the architectural > foundation for any (development) tool but LC Workbench. But don't take my > word for it, get a second opinion from someone who has been working with LC > for a while. > > Jochem > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion is delivering applications solutions at at top companies around the world in government. Find out how and where now http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/showcase/index.cfm?event=finder&productID=1522&loc=en_us Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:243713 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
