Should we now post the hundreds...or more likely thousands...of scientific experts who espouse the opposite viewpoint? I mean, when it's all said and done, for every 10 scientists you find who doubt anthropogenic global warming, we'll have 90 who support it.
Really, the posturing is pretty much over...it's now simply a question of who you believe: the soundly supported and tested majority, or the intriguing but ultimately unverified doubters? On 10/24/07, Jerry Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [start quote] > > One of the world's foremost meteorologists has called the theory that > helped > Al Gore share the Nobel Peace Prize "ridiculous" and the product of > "people > who don't understand how the atmosphere works". > > Dr William Gray, a pioneer in the science of seasonal hurricane forecasts, > told a packed lecture hall at the University of North Carolina that humans > were not responsible for the warming of the earth. > [end quote] > > the rest is here if you are interested: > > > http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/gore-gets-a-cold-shoulder/2007/10/13/1191696238792.html > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get the answers you are looking for on the ColdFusion Labs Forum direct from active programmers and developers. http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm?forumid-72&catid=648 Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:244990 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
