"I still think a compromise is preferable an all-or-nothing approach. Cameron, what do you think of the idea of allowing certain, narrowly defined businesses to remain as smoking establishments? Or is it unacceptable to allow smokers ANY place to gather in a public location?"
I just wanted to point out that the California ban is not "all or nothing". There is a clause that an establishment can become a "smoking" establishment just as long as all employees are informed of this status before hire. I believe it is a little more convoluted to convert an existing non-smoking establishment involving employee consensus. As well as the establishment clearly indicates that it allows smoking at the entrance. Interesting to this argument is that few establishments have bothered with doing this. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:249540 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
