I thought all government funded heart attacks are handled directly by 
IRS agents.

-Cameron

Loathe wrote:
> The study didn't say less government funded heart attacks, just less heart
> attacks.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cameron Childress [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 1:18 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Smoke and Mirrors - Study shows Smoking Ban Results in Fewer
> Heart Attacks
>
> G Money wrote:
>   
>> Wait, I thought the idea of letting pure economics solve this issue was
>> completely out the window.....????
>>
>>   
>>     
>
> Directly?  It is for me.  I think a smoking ban has very very little 
> effect economically on the establishments, good or bad.
>
> Indirectly?  It does have an economic impact.  My taxes go to pay for 
> smoker's health bills.  Not exactly a free market force, but it is an 
> economic impact.  Of course the logical Libertarian argument here is 
> that the government should get out of healthcare too.  Unfortunately, 
> that's a pipe dream - I can't stop the government from taking away my 
> money and giving it to other people, but in this case a smoking ban 
> would decrease the amount of money the government spent on healthcare.  
> I'm pretty sure the government wouldn't actually give any of it back to 
> me, but at least they wouldn't be spending as much on smoking related 
> healthcare.
>
> -Cameron
>   

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:249576
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to