Evolution wasn't taught until well after Darwin even though it was around way before. Maybe if they did teach it we would have been proven it sooner.
On Jan 7, 2008 1:12 PM, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sam wrote: > "I thought the purpose of science was to answer questions. > You can't find the answer to questions if you don't know them." > > And if you can not observe, make predictions and test the answers - science > will not answer them at this time. > > Until such a time as science has advanced to such a point that these ideas > can be observed, predicted and tested, the untestable answers to these > questions do not belong in science class. They belong in other disciplines > that have often been the source of these "ideas" you seem rather concerned > about loosing. Why do ID proponents feel such a strong need to bypass this > proven methodology and make science something it is not supposed to be? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:250020 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
