> tBone wrote: > F the funding model G > > It's illegal, it's against the law without a constitutional amendment, why > do we need to talk past that issue? >
:) agreed The reason is because there are lots of people that think the best way to solve problems is to throw them at the gov't. Then, of course they talk about taxes. In this case if taxes paid premiums we still couldn't afford it. It's simply not an option - at least the way our industry is set up. I'm trying to educate people that even if we agreed that it wasn't illegal and that it wouldn't raise taxes, the government is *worst* equipped to the solve US health care problems. We're not set up like other countries so we can't just adopt their model and go home. The reason that the summary of HillaryCare was 14 pages is because we have a complicated system and if there's one way to REALLY complicate it, it's to have to government take it over. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:251038 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
