He _might_ be saying that the exact same argument, when made by Muslims, is always poopoo-ed.
If it is a valid argument for Catholics with their fringes, is it also good enough for Muslims with suicide bombers? Or Mormons with respect to their poligamists? On Feb 19, 2008 11:46 AM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 19, 2008 10:25 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I meant weak in a "weak" defense. I'm saying that defense is just as weak > > as muslim's saying the same thing. > > > > Yeah, I know. And i'm wondering why you think it's weak? What should the > Church have done that could have been stronger? They disavow any > relationship between these crazies and their own Church. Beyond that...what > kind of STRONG action would you advocate? > > Like it or not, what those idiots do is a protected freedom here in America. > > -- > My word's but a whisper > Your deafness, a shout > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:254433 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
