I can agree with that, I guess.
On Feb 19, 2008 11:27 AM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, OK :) > > Still though, I think there is a key difference, at least with Muslim > suicide bombers: What they are doing is ILLEGAL, and against any sound > moral > code. It's the job of everyone to actively fight against terrorists. > > In the case of the St. Mary's misogynists, they are simply idiots...but > not > criminals. With idiots, disavowing them should be enough. With criminals, > more should action should be required. > > On Feb 19, 2008 10:57 AM, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > He _might_ be saying that the exact same argument, when made by > > Muslims, is always poopoo-ed. > > > > If it is a valid argument for Catholics with their fringes, is it also > > good enough for Muslims with suicide bombers? Or Mormons with respect > > to their poligamists? > > > > -- > My word's but a whisper > Your deafness, a shout > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:254458 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
