> Gel wrote: > WHat makes Clinton or McCain's Campaign any heavier on Substance? > What Substance did Bush run on? >
Well, the argument goes, McCain has years of legislative experience, "substance", and Hillary has ... well there's Hillary but that was a failure ... Oh. There's her Iraq stand. Which she keeps changing ... I know, it's her economic ... no she has none of that and she copied Obama's Goolsby-driven focus .... Huh. Oh, and Bush? He ran on all that stuff he's doing the opposite of. You know, like no-nation-building, controlling spending, solving social security ... those things. You know, now that you mention it he's a lot like Hillary! Failed liberal policies! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:254604 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
