Here's a well-researched (long) piece that came out today examining Obama's
legislative work in the US Senate as found on the Library of Congress Web
site. It does compare his work to Hillary's but I was more struck by the
depth and breadth of the bills in general.

"I Refuse to Buy Into the Obama Hype"

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/20/201332/807/36/458633


-----Original Message-----
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 7:06 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Obama's Answers

> Gel wrote:
> WHat makes Clinton or McCain's Campaign any heavier on Substance?
>  What Substance did Bush run on?
>

Well, the argument goes, McCain has years of legislative experience,
"substance", and Hillary has ... well there's Hillary but that was a
failure ... Oh.  There's her Iraq stand.  Which she keeps changing ...
I know, it's her economic ... no she has none of that and she copied
Obama's Goolsby-driven focus ....

Huh.

Oh, and Bush?  He ran on all that stuff he's doing the opposite of.
You know, like no-nation-building, controlling spending, solving
social security ... those things.  You know, now that you mention it
he's a lot like Hillary!  Failed liberal policies!



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:254659
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to