> Yeah, that's not a good thing. That's something Buchanan > would do, not Bush. To me, this is a serious departure from > his free trade stance of the election. If Canada is > illegally dumping/subsidizing cheap lumber on the US then the > tariff is justified. If they are subsidizing the lumber > industry and it's not illegal, then the tariff should be
Question though - legal to whom? If it's legal for Canada to subsidize their lumber industry, it doesn't mean we have to accept it, right? > repealed. We do our own share of subsidizing here and it's > plain wrong no matter who does it. It is contrary to free Amen. If the current way of thinking was around 200 years ago, we would have subsidized horse carriages. Heck, I'm surprised we didn't subsidize derigible(sp) companies. -rc ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
