Apparently you thought I was agreeing with what Bush did and I do not.  The only 
caveat I made was if Canada was violating provisions of the NAFTA then we would be 
justified in taking action in terms of higher tariffs.  If they're not, then we are 
wrong for raising the tariffs.  I also stated, not in this post but in a later one, 
that regardless of NAFTA provisions, we are on moral and ethical shaky ground because 
we do the same thing (i.e. subsidize industries) and that's wrong.  

I am all for competition and this will be a wake up call for US companies, again, that 
there are other companies/countries finding ways to do it better, faster, cheaper then 
we are, so if you want to stay in business, learn to compete without relying on Uncle 
Sam to fight your fights for you.  If there is illegal dumping, then the government 
should step up.  I don't think it's true in this case so it doesn't apply.  The 
government needs to back off and repeal the tax (again, as long as their actions are 
not in violation of the NAFTA).

Michael Corrigan
Programmer
Endora Digital Solutions
1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200
Lombard, IL 60148
630-627-5055 ext.-136
630/627-5255 Fax
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Larry Lyons 
  To: CF-Community 
  Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:49 PM
  Subject: RE: What is he doing......


  Mike,

  No, what the US Lumber industry has been after for years is for what's known
  as the Canadian social safety net to be substantially changed. Per employee
  costs are very different given the forest industry. Since the typical
  Canadian lumber company does not have to pay for medical insurance etc, that
  is a lower per employee cost. 

  Moreover while the stumpage fees are substantially lower in Canada, the
  companies operating on Crown land, similar to the US Forest Service land,
  have to pay for roads and any support services. The US forest service pays
  for this out of the higher stumpage fees it charges. Similarly in Canada
  reforestation is the responsibility of the private firm, while again that is
  funded through stumpage fees in the US.

  Costs are about the same in the end. However just before NAFTA went into
  effect, Canadian firms went through a big modernizing phase a few years
  back, laying off a lot of people, and updating equipment. Now these same
  firms are far more efficient that their American competitors.

  So who is being anti-competitive here? US lumber firms are just whining
  because while many Canadian firms reinvested in their companies, US firms
  just wanted to squeeze every bit of profitability from the lumber tracts. It
  seems that after Bush has been talking a lot about fair trade, he simply
  doesn't want to exhibit any.

  larry

  --
  Larry C. Lyons
  ColdFusion/Web Developer
  Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
  EBStor.com
  8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204
  Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795
  tel:   (703) 393-7930
  fax:   (703) 393-2659
  Web:   http://www.ebstor.com
         http://www.pacel.com
  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
  --

  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: Michael Corrigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:17 PM
  > To: CF-Community
  > Subject: Re: What is he doing......
  > 
  > 
  > Yeah, that's not a good thing.  That's something Buchanan 
  > would do, not Bush.  To me, this is a serious departure from 
  > his free trade stance of the election.  If Canada is 
  > illegally dumping/subsidizing cheap lumber on the US then the 
  > tariff is justified.  If they are subsidizing the lumber 
  > industry and it's not illegal, then the tariff should be 
  > repealed.  We do our own share of subsidizing here and it's 
  > plain wrong no matter who does it.  It is contrary to free 
  > trade and open markets let alone competition.  We lose any 
  > moral high ground because we subsidize many of our 
  > corporations, industries (shipping, steel, etc.), and agriculture.
  > 
  > Thanks for the post!
  > 
  > Michael Corrigan
  > Programmer
  > Endora Digital Solutions
  > 1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200
  > Lombard, IL 60148
  > 630-627-5055 ext.-136
  > 630/627-5255 Fax
  >   ----- Original Message ----- 
  >   From: Michael Ross 
  >   To: CF-Community 
  >   Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 2:04 PM
  >   Subject: What is he doing......
  > 
  > 
  >   Way to go Bush, rack up another stupid move........
  > 
  >   
  http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Artic
  le_Type1&c=Article&cid=1016797518288&call_page=TS_News&call_pageid=968332188
  492&call_pagepath=News/News&col=968793972154

    linemonster
    ah
    ah
    ah
    ah
    ah
    ah
    ah



    

  
______________________________________________________________________
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to