> cHat wrote:
> You don't.
>

I dunno ... we had something similar to this in the 60s and 70s and we
used conspiracy and RICO laws (and now hate law) to fight it.  That
would work with Islam save for one factor: it hasn't been easy to
infiltrate the networks.

What's happening is seems simple - although I could be wrong:

1.) peaceful Islamists create a community in, say, England.

2.) Saudi Arabia trains a radical imam and his sect sends him to the
church in England.

3.) The imam starts a slow process of indoctrination while running
secret cells that are exciting to teens and the radical at heart.

Next thing you know, boom, and now the people of the mosque either
can't believe it was their Imam that caused it, so they forget it, or
they support it.

It's no different than Nazis or the Japanese or the communists.  In
their own ways, all of these were religions.  The difference is that
back then travel and communications were primitive so those forces
would take over a country and then we'd fight the country.

Now it's an asymmetrical war and there's no play book there.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:257716
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to