> tBone  wrote:
> Bad comparison.

It's not a comparison.

The framework laid out is that those countries who's citizens or
soldiers are attacked by Al Quaeda can apprehend "agents on the
battlefield" and hold them indefinitely without process.  Further,
Robert trusts the military implicitly to decide who's an "agent" and
who isn't.

This framework would mean, for example, that if you're traveling in
Europe, say Paris, and there's a terrorist attack the French could
apprehend and imprison you based on their own criteria.  They could
ship you to a gulag in the Indian Ocean somewhere and you'd have no
rights to challenge your detention or bring your case before a neutral
magistrate.

Why?  Because the military has their own awesome rules about
determining who agents are and you should trust the government.
They're here to help you.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:262361
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to