> Therefore if, via interpretation, we say permits are acceptable (i.e., > we can ban "bearing arms" at certain times and places) then we can't > also claim that an outright ban is unconstitutional.
I *think* the Supreme Court justices know a *wee* bit more about this than you do. > Personally I'm for well-regulated gun ownership regardless of what the > Constitution says. And, thankfully for those of us who do care what the Constitution says, it doesn't matter what you think. Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis President Productivity Enhancement ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:262925 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
