clarification: "a federal right to use a gun" *defending your home*
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> gMoney wrote: >> closer than it should have been. This ruling meant 4 justices thought it was >> OK to out-and-out ban gun ownership. > > Well, I haven't read the dissenting opinions, but I think they more > felt that local laws could dictate ownership rights rather than "ban" > guns. Further the ruling didn't say anything other than the 2nd gives > a homeowner a federal right to use a gun. A good ruling, but one that > makes nothing clear. > > Your reading of it seems to make both sides crystal clear while mine > has both sides very hazy. > -- "A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:263193 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
