I'm all for environmental impact studies. I'm also very much in favour of wind turbines, hydroelectricity and other forms of low impact methods of generating energy. But how to balance the conflicting needs?
That said when done correctly environmental impact studies regularly produce very surprising results. Sometimes they may stop a project, but more often they end up supporting most projects. Other times they come up with some surprising results. I remember reading about one case where an expansion of hydro dam project in northern Manitoba resulted in a threatened species of pike rebounding. They're now considered a sport fish. >On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Can't they put like some sort of sound generators...or bright flashing >> lights on the blades or something like that? > >From what I have read, they actually do studies of migratory patterns >and either don't build them in those areas or shut them down during >migration seasons. You can also adjust the height of the turbines to >be lower/higher than the migration paths. > >...oh, and they put a yodeler on top of each turbine. > >Maybe they should stop all wind farm approvals and do a two year >environmental impact study? > >-Cameron ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:264085 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
