> tBone wrote:
> None of these things is supposed to be under the control of the federal
> government.
>
>

Well I'm for protecting the physical country, the economic country,
and providing the infrastructure to enable the freedom to prosper.

2 weeks ago, I'd have said that the market rules all, but I'm now
doing a 180.  I've always been a proponent of a "well regulated"
market, but "well" meant illegal or not.

What I've learned is that that is not sufficient to protect the
economy from meltdown and has created a monster bailout situation
wherein the massively stupid (on the top and bottom of the economic
scale) are going to get bailed out by the rest of us that did things
right.

And our only other choice would be let those massively stupid people
drag us down with them.

Thus we need enough regulation to protect us from bailing out the
stupid which is going to mean limiting the market.

The same argument goes for healthcare: consumer directed healthcare
will cover 80%, but 20% (the stupid, unlucky, and unfortunate) will
need help.  And out only 2 choices are to provide the help or lose our
medical freedom altogether.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:264473
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to