Mikey- waitaminit: by "possible" -
were you referring to women in the Middle East withholding marital relations, or to Ben being serious?? -Ben > -----Original Message----- > From: Braver, Ben [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:02 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Not getting any (RE: Why (Re: They invaded! 0_0)) > > > you have seen (rare) examples of it > but usually not - > job description of "court jester" on list > precludes doing it very often > ;-) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:01 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Not getting any (RE: Why (Re: They invaded! 0_0)) > > > > > > Yep, I was. If it was possible I'd be all for it. > > > > At 11:49 AM 4/2/02, you wrote: > > >Mikey- > > > > > >you're assuming I was serious > > >;-) > > > > > >-Ben > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 8:51 AM > > >> To: CF-Community > > >> Subject: Not getting any (RE: Why (Re: They invaded! 0_0)) > > >> > > >> > > >> Your assuming that women in the middle east (at least in most > > >> Muslim cultures) have the right to refuse. The rights of > > >> women are very restricted even in such places as Saudi > > >> Arabia. A woman can be arrested for just driving a car (as > > >> was seen during the gulf war when a number of women tried it > > >> in protest). > > >> > > >> At 11:33 AM 4/2/02, you wrote: > > >> >Hey! > > >> >What we need for peace is a Middle East version of Lysistrata - > > >> >the women say "until we get peace, you're not getting any" !! > > >> >-Ben > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >> -----Original Message----- > > >> >> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 8:13 AM > > >> >> To: CF-Community > > >> >> Subject: Re: Why (Re: They invaded! 0_0) > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> Another example of terrorism: > > >> >> > > >> >> British suffragists early last century. > > >> >> > > >> >> (Just finished reading a book on this subject - they were > > >> >> some SCARY women!) > > >> >> > > >> >> Jerry Johnson > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/02/02 10:57AM >>> > > >> >> More like treasonist. > > >> >> > > >> >> They didn't do too much killing of the women and children, > > >> >> and no suicide > > >> >> bombings. They only attacked people with ties to the British > > >> >> Government, > > >> >> mostly military ties, a few people with monetary ties, like > > >> >> tax collectors > > >> >> and the customs officers. > > >> >> > > >> >> At 10:52 AM 4/2/2002 -0500, you wrote: > > >> >> >Agreed. I'm the colonists that rebeled against England were > > >> >> considered > > >> >> >terrorists at the time. Probably still could be. > > >> >> > > > >> >> >Todd > > >> >> > > > >> >> >----- Original Message ----- > > >> >> >From: "Mark Smyth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> >> >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> >> >Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:42 AM > > >> >> >Subject: RE: Why (Re: They invaded! 0_0) > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >They (the Palistinians) are the terrorists. > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > Surely the issue of whether they are terrorists > > depends on your > > >> >> >perspective > > >> >> > > of the situation? I'm not condoning anything, its just > > >> >> an observation > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
