yeah well... courts are sort of famous for allowing the first amendment. Who knows any more though. My understanding is this -- the documents are news. They confirm that she used her YAHOO ACCOUNT FOR CRISSAKES to conduct government business in an effort to avoid subpoenas.
Hacking the account was probably illegal. They may be able to pressure the owners of the website to name their source for the documents. That there is a grey area. On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm talking about whether the courts allow it. > > BTW, an update - looks like the people responsible are going to be > caught, because they are morons: > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/18/palin_email_investigation/ > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Dana wrote: >> if you thnk this is precedent-setting -- have you been paying attention >> lately? >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:269852 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
