On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Dana wrote: >> You are assigning motives without knowing the full picture. A staffer >> (Ivy Frye) is the one who brought up all the issues of subpoena and >> personal accounts. > > And you claim she is lying or mistaken?
We know what Ivy Frye said. Everything else surrounding what she said is speculation. >> What seems clear is that most of the email she received in that box >> was personal in nature > > the key word here is "most." Even an unblushing apologist like you > doesn't claim it was "all." My wife sends me email from her personal account to my business account sometimes. I'd rather she didn't, but she does. All it proves is that it is easy to get these things crossed up. >> As for security, if you are so concerned about security, where is your >> outrage over the hack itself, which is a felony under federal law? >> Where is your concern there? > > The world is a mean place. People do try to hack things. Usually it > isn't an American teenager. Not everyone who will be trying to read > her email if she took office would be a) easily caught or even > detected or b) prosecutable or c) nice enough to tell us what data > they compromised. > > In other words, if her arrogance put her in harm's way from script > kiddies, imagine what will happen when it's for real and the data is > more than embarrassing. So your answer is No, you don't care about hacking. You'd rather blame the victim. How ironic. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:270232 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
