well see that is the problem with a strict interpretation of the constituion applied to issues the writers hadn't dreamt of. You can get there though either from a) separation of church and state or b) if you can't search my house why is your business whether I am pregnant?
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah not so much, it's not in there. > > Different states should be able to set different standards according to > the legislation put forward by the elected representatives of the people. > > Should be constitution 101, what does the 10th amendment say? > > I will admit that even I have expanded my own limits on what should be > legislated at federal level, but this just doesn't pass the test. > > I'm pro-choice, would support that legislature in my own state, but > honestly, thats the form of government we're supposed to have here. > > > Dana wrote: >> the right to be left the fuck alone. >> >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> What is the constitutional impetus? >>> >>> Gruss Gott wrote: >>>>> tBone wrote: >>>>> I think roe v wade was a terrible decision, it should have been left to >>>>> the states to handle. >>>>> >>>> I think it should've been left up to people who can see clinics from >>>> their window. >>>> >>>> You know, experts. >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:272253 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
