On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Annenberg Challenge was his only executive experience.

Robert said accomplishments, not executive experience.

Can you even define executive experience?

> Here's what he thinks of the constitution:
No, that's what he thinks of certain Supreme Court actions, i.e. their
failure to address issues regarding distribution of wealth, and an
attempt to correct misconceptions about the Warren Court.

It merely says that the Warren Court did not break from the
constraints placed in the Constitution by the founding fathers.  It
does not suggest that the court should have done so.

> "But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of
> redistribution of wealth and the more basic issues of political and
> economic justice in this society, and to that extent, as radical as, I
> think, people try to characterize the Warren court, it wasn't that
> radical; it didn't break free from the essential constraints that were
> placed by the Founding Fathers and the Constitution, as least as it's
> been interpreted." -  Barack Obama
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 1. Harvard Law School
>> 2. President of the Harvard Law Review,
>> 3. Constitutional Law Professor
>> 4. Illinois State Senate
>> 5. US Senate
>> 6. Democratic nominee for President
>>
>> Yeah, running that Challenge was one of his few significant accomplishments
>>
>> Fail!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:277138
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to