See message to Sam.  Nothing in that statement is a critique of
anything.  It's simply a statement of how the courts have rules.

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> His critique of the Constitution, essentially, is that the Founders did not
> include socialist concepts like "social justice" in it. They didn't include
> those kinds of concepts because they didn't believe in them. "Life, liberty,
> and the pursuit of happiness" is what Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of
> Independence. He specifically changed what John Locke had written about
> man's right to life, liberty, and property because he didn't believe men had
> an inalienable right to property.
>
> Obama finds it tragic, in other words, that the Founders were not
> socialists. They were men who believed in the value of hard work and
> accomplishment. That has been the American tradition every since, and it is
> one of the core beliefs that has set us apart from Europe. Will people
> decide this time around that they want to try socialism? Maybe, and if so,
> that's what we'll get.
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Judah wrote:
>
>>
>> Actually, that's what he thinks about the Supreme Court's
>> investigation of a certain area of law. Regardless, what is wrong with
>> the statement? Is there some part of it you disagree with? Did the
>> court get into the issue of redistribution of wealth and the basic
>> issues of political and economic justice in society?
>>
>> As far as I'm aware, he's correct, the Warren court never got into
>> that. Is he mistaken?
>>
>>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:277143
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to