I've been shot at multiple times (in the U.S.) and used a gun twice without firing it for self defense. That's not even going into the things I've done overseas.
The assault weapons ban certainly limits your access to a whole class of guns, and that's the specific thing that the supreme court found unconstitutional in Heller. I think you're allowing your personal experience to cloud your judgment here. You are normally against things that require registration and limiting the rights of citizens, against the federal government becoming more intrusive. I know I'm not going to change your mind here though. > -----Original Message----- > From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 5:36 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Obama coming after the guns > > Maybe I'm just dense on this issue since my son got shot at > in a drive-by a few years ago, but I fail to see anything on > that page that if enacted would take guns from law abiding citizens. > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One day, all it took was one day for my hopeful attitude to > get slammed: > > > > http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Federal/Read.aspx?id=4227 > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:279746 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
