One thing that concerns me (but does not keep me up at night) is that if anythignlike 9/11 or some other attac ever occured in DC, my area, Jefferson County, WV, could be a spot people would flee to. Given that circumstance, seeign me with an assualt rifle on my fron porch or back deck may give osmeone pasue to try and make my house their own.
Not probable, I admit, but possible. And that scares the shit out of me. On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Judah McAuley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I used to feel the same way about assault rifles and I heard an argument > > that I really could not rebut. 'The bad guys don't care about gun > control > > and what is legal or illegal. If they can get assault rifles, either > > legally or illegally, I want to be able to get one to 'even the fight' ' > > > > For me, its hard to argue with that logic. It would be difficult to > defend > > yourself effectively with a handgun or shotgun when the bad guys may have > > assault rifles. > > This argument has some appeal but I don't know if it really holds up. > Chances are the average person who is going to be using a gun in self > defense isn't out on patrol, waiting for an attack. If there were > equal preparation between the attacker and the person being attacked, > I can see how the disparity if firepower might be decisive. But if you > are at home and asleep, I don't know that a fully-automatic uzi is > going to be more useful to you than a pistol. > > I suppose that if you just started firing off, you are going to have a > slightly higher chance of hitting your target somehow (if you are > trained) with a fully automatic weapon (or even semi-automatic) than a > semi-automatic pistol or rifle. But by the same token you are much > more likely to hit things you aren't really aiming at. Assault weapons > have a tendency to sacrifice accuracy for number of shots. And when > you are defending your own home, the things you don't really mean to > hit are much more meaningful than if you are the one doing the > assault. > > The bad guys may have assault rifles, this is true. But in a home > defense situation, I don't know that you really want to be starting a > firefight. I figure you either have been made aware of the situation > and know someone is in your house or you are caught totally unawares. > If you know something is going on, then you probably have close to the > same odds with a pistol I'd guess. And as for deterrent value, a gun > is a gun I'd say. The homeowner can kill you as an intruder or they > can't. And if you aren't aware of the situation, I'd say that having > an assault rifle increases the chances of unintended consequences in a > panic situation. > > So either way, I think that assault rifles make sense for assault > situations and war zones but not so much for home defense. > > My 0.02 > > Judah > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:279763 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
