I think individuals should be able to have anything that common leg infantry have.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Judah McAuley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 6:59 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Obama coming after the guns > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Scott Stroz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It could be argued that the 'arms' would encompass the > firearm and the > > ammunition. > > Out of curiosity, what are people's opinions about the > limitations of the 2nd Amendment? Few, if any, people seem to > have problems with hunting rifles. Hand guns for personal > defense seem to be pretty middle-of-the-road. > > But what about those that take a more absolutist standpoint? > Where do we draw the line in terms of firepower? Assault > rifles, hand grenades, rocket launchers, nuclear weapons? At > the end points it seems absurd, but I'm not really sure that > there is an obvious line to draw and I'm curious about where > people would draw the line and why. > > And what about the issues surrounding it, like background > checks, trigger locks, types of ammunition, mandatory > firearms education classes, etc? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:279776 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
