And so far what he has done meets your own definition of 'change'? All he has appointed are liberals from the Clinton administration.
Just like the $2,000,000 party where it was not part of the 'change' philosophy becasue everyone else before him did it, I guess only appointing Democrats to posts gets a pass for the same reason. I am still holding out hope. Actions speak louer than words and so far I have not seen an indication that we truly are headed for 'real change'. > > > Secondly, I'm not quite sure what is going to fit your definition of > "change". Do all of his picks need to have never been part of the > government before? The change that I'm looking for is a mix of > conservative/liberal folks, some people with Washington experience, > some from more outside the beltway. In other words a government meant > to function and be inclusive of diverse viewpoints and experience > rather than an ideologically-driven frat house. > > -- Scott Stroz If you can't laugh at other people, who can you laugh at? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280394 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
