On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And so far what he has done meets your own definition of 'change'? All he > has appointed are liberals from the Clinton administration.
Perhaps you weren't paying attention again, but I already said what he's done that I consider change. Look at lobbying rules during transition and public comment period on legislation as examples. > Just like the $2,000,000 party where it was not part of the 'change' > philosophy becasue everyone else before him did it, I guess only appointing > Democrats to posts gets a pass for the same reason. What posts are you referring to? The only high profile appointment that I know of so far is Chief of Staff. And yes, he is a Democrat as I would expect someone in that position to be of the same party most likely. > I am still holding out hope. Actions speak louer than words and so far I > have not seen an indication that we truly are headed for 'real change'. > He's not announced nominations, as far as I am aware, for any Senate-confirmable posts like Cabinet positions. He has done actual 'real change' in the way the transition is being conducted. So...yeah....actual change in the things he has control over and needs to do first. No change yet in the other places because he hasn't finished vetting candidates for other positions. So what's your problem with this? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280397 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
