At the risk of putting words in Sam's mouth. I _think_ what he is trying to say is that since we do not know what is causing the climate change, should we really be spending tons of money on a 'solution'? If you don't know the cause of the problem, how can you have a solution to it?
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Michael Grant [Modus IS] <[email protected]>wrote: > Your stance seems to be that since we can't prove global warming exists we > shouldn't change anything with regards to green house gas emissions. So > you're right, my mind is closed to that logic (read: absurdity) > > > -- Scott Stroz Some people are like slinkies...not really good for anything but they bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:283184 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
