You miss the point entirely and you seem to be oblivious to the economics
involved. The size of the CFC economy was minuscule compared to the fossil
fuel economy. Someone has to pay to replace or retool gas stations, gas
lines, coal plants, tanker fleets, truck fleets, automobiles, manufacturing
plants- the list is endless. Tens of trillions of dollars worth of
infrastructure. Who is going to pay for it? Oh right, we'll just print more
money and pass the debt on to our children. Screw that.


On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote:

> You seem to have selective amnesia. The argument back then was that it
> would be disastrous to our economy. Everything had CFC's in it. People
> would hate the alternatives and the alternatives were inferior, no one
> would use them, blah blah blah. Why spend untold amounts of money on a
> theory that may or may not be true and if it was still might not make
> a difference for decades if ever?
>
> Same fucking story 20 years later. Oddly enough, by much the same
> people inside government and out. Been a really tired record going
> around and around.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:283300
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to