>On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Larry Lyons <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Welcome to the twisted world of the really extreme Christian right AKA the
>> Dominionist Theocracy movement. If they ever get into power, they'll be far
>> worse than the current Iranian regime or the Taliban have been.
>
>
>I hate the extreme christian right as much as anybody....but worse than the
>Taliban???? How so?

Google Dominionist or Christian Dominionist. Here's a couple of links to get 
you started
http://www.jewsonfirst.org/dominionism.html
http://www.religioustolerance.org/reconstr.htm
http://www.mainstreambaptists.org/mob4/dominionism.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_Theology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Reconstructionism

The following quote is taken from the jewsonfirst.org site:
        
Web site logo
DOMINIONISM
(A.K.A. CHRISTIAN RECONSTRUCTIONISM,
DOMINION THEOLOGY, AND THEONOMY)

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.

horizontal rule
History:

Dominionism, Dominion Theology, Christian Reconstructionism, Theocratic 
Dominionism, and Theonomy are not denominations or faith groups. Rather, they 
are interrelated beliefs which are followed by members of a wide range of 
Christian denominations. They have no connection at all to Reconstructionist 
Judaism, which is a liberal group within Judaism.

Generally speaking:
bullet  Dominionism & Dominion Theology are derived from Genesis 1:26 of the 
Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament):

    "Then God said, 'Let us make man in our image, in our likeness and let them 
rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, 
over all the earth and over all the creatures that move along the ground.'" 
(NIV)

Most Christians interpret this verse as meaning that God gave mankind dominion 
over the animal kingdom. Dominion theologians believe that that this verse 
commands Christians to bring all societies, around the world, under the rule of 
the Word of God.
bullet  Theonomy (Greek for "God's Law") includes the concept that "God’s 
revealed standing laws are a reflection of His immutable moral character and, 
as such, are absolute in the sense of being nonarbitrary, objective, universal, 
and established in advance of particular circumstances (thus applicable to 
general types of moral situations)." 6,7 Thus, each of the 613 laws given to 
Moses and recorded in the Pentateuch (the first 5 books of the Hebrew 
Scriptures) are binding on people of all nations, cultures, and religions 
forever, except for those laws which have been specifically rescinded or 
modified by further revelation.
bullet  Christian Reconstructionism arose out of conservative Presbyterianism 
in the early 1970's. Followers believe "that every area dominated by sin must 
be 'reconstructed' in terms of the Bible." 1

The term Reconstructionism has been used to refer to various combinations of 
the preceding three terms. This type of confusion is common in the field of 
religion. Many theological terms such as Christian, Fundamentalist, Occult, New 
Age, Reconstructionism, Unitarian etc. have been assigned so many different 
interpretations by different groups in different eras that they are almost 
meaningless.

Its most common form, Dominionism, represents one of the most extreme forms of 
Fundamentalist Christianity thought. Its followers, called Dominionists, are 
attempting to peacefully convert the laws of United States so that they match 
those of the Hebrew Scriptures. They intend to achieve this by using the 
freedom of religion in the US to train a generation of children in private 
Christian religious schools. Later, their graduates will be charged with the 
responsibility of creating a new Bible-based political, religious and social 
order. One of the first tasks of this order will be to eliminate religious 
choice and freedom. Their eventual goal is to achieve the "Kingdom of God" in 
which much of the world is converted to Christianity. They feel that the power 
of God's word will bring about this conversion. No armed force or insurrection 
will be needed; in fact, they believe that there will be little opposition to 
their plan. People will willingly accept it. All that needs to be done is to 
properly explain it to them.

All religious organizations, congregations etc. other than strictly 
Fundamentalist Christianity would be suppressed. Nonconforming Evangelical, 
main line and liberal Christian religious institutions would no longer be 
allowed to hold services, organize, proselytize, etc. Society would revert to 
the laws and punishments of the Hebrew Scriptures. Any person who advocated or 
practiced other religious beliefs outside of their home would be tried for 
idolatry and executed. Blasphemy, adultery and homosexual behavior would be 
criminalized; those found guilty would also be executed. At that time that this 
essay was originally written, this was the only religious movement in North 
America of which we were aware which advocates genocide for followers of 
minority religions and non-conforming members of their own religion. Since 
then, we have learned of two conservative Christian pastors in Texas who have 
advocated the execution of all Wiccans. Ralph Reed, the executive director of 
the conservative public policy group the Christian Coalition has criticized 
Reconstructionism as "an authoritarian ideology that threatens the most basic 
civil liberties of a free and democratic society."

Leading writers in the movement are:
bullet  Greg L. Bahnsen of the Southern California Center for Christian Studies.
bullet  David Chilton. He adopted hyper-preterism, (a.k.a. full or complete 
perterism) a particular belief about end time events. He was basically 
ostracized from the Christian Reconstruction camp afterwards.
bullet  Gary DeMar.
bullet  Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr.
bullet  Gary North of the Institute for Christian Economics. He is a prolific 
author.
bullet  Larry Pratt: head of the Gun Owners of America and English First, a 
group opposed to non-English speaking immigrants and bilingual education. 
Author of "Armed People Victorious" which documents Guatemalan and Philippine 
militias and para-military death squads. He was campaign co-chair of the 
Buchanan presidential campaign in 1996.
bullet  John Quade.
bullet  Rousas John Rushdoony of the Chalcedon Foundation is often considered 
the founder of Christian Reconstructionism. Author of Institutes of Biblical 
Law.
bullet  Rev. Andrew Sandlin.

horizontal rule
Beliefs:

According to Gary DeMar, a popular Reconstructionist author, the foundation of 
Reconstructionism is a unique combination of three Biblical doctrines:

   1. Regeneration of the individual, through an intimate relationship with 
Christ
   2. Individuals guiding their lives closely by following a specified subset 
of Biblical laws
   3. Promoting of the world-wide Kingdom of God. 2

Specific beliefs include
bullet  A rejection of Antinomianism: the belief that salvation is obtained 
totally through faith and not through performing good works and living a moral 
life
bullet  Presuppositionalism: the acceptance on faith that the Bible is true. 
They do not attempt to prove  that God exists or that the Bible is true.
bullet  Inerrancy: the belief that the Bible, as originally written, is totally 
free of error.
bullet  Postmillennialism: the belief that Christ will not return to earth 
until much of the world has converted to Christianity. This will not take place 
for some considerable time; it will not be a painless transition. Most 
Fundamentalists and other Evangelists hold to a different view. They are 
Premillenialists and believe that all (or almost all) of the preconditions of 
Christ's return have been met. They expect Jesus' second coming to occur very 
soon.
bullet  The 613 laws contained in the Hebrew Scriptures' Mosaic Code can be 
divided into two classes: moral and ceremonial. Christians are not required to 
follow the ceremonial laws, because Jesus has liberated them from that 
responsibility. However, all persons must follow those moral laws which were 
not specifically modified or cancelled by further revelation --generally in the 
Christian Scriptures (New Testament). In contrast:
bullet  Non-reconstructionist Christians generally divide these laws into three 
classes: moral, civil and ceremonial law, and generally believe that most Old 
Testament laws are no longer binding on Christians.
bullet  Jews generally believe that the Mosaic Code is binding only on Jews.
bullet  The moral laws given by God to the ancient Israelites reflect of God's 
character, which is unchangeable. Most of the laws are intended for all 
nations, cultures, societies, religions and all eras, including the present 
time. However, there are a few laws, in such areas as personal safety and 
sanitation, which are no longer applicable because of changes in architecture 
and sewage disposal. These do not need to be obeyed.
bullet  The primacy of the Hebrew Scriptures, relative to the Christian 
Scriptures (New Testament). All of the Hebrew Scriptures' non-ceremonial laws 
are still in force, unless they have been specifically rescinded or modified by 
verses in the Christian Scriptures. "Only if we find an explicit abandonment of 
an Old Testament law in the New Testament, because of the historic fulfillment 
of the Old Testament shadow, can we legitimately abandon a detail of the Mosaic 
law." 3 This is largely supported by their interpretation of Matthew 5:17:

    "Do you think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have 
not come to abolish them but to fulfill them." (NIV)

bullet  Civil laws must be changed to match the Bible's moral rules. That is, 
anything that is immoral (by their standards) is also to be criminalized.
bullet  The only valid legislation, social theory, spiritual beliefs, economic 
theory are those derived from the Bible
bullet  In every aspect of life, there are only two options: God-centered or 
man-centered; Theonomy or autonomy. Their political goal is to ban the latter, 
everywhere. Each individual, family, church, government and society must be 
reconstructed to eliminate sin. Each Christian has the responsibility to 
contribute to this conversion.
bullet  They oppose inter-faith, inter-racial, and same-sex marriages. R.J. 
Rushdoony wrote about opposition to:

    "inter-religious, inter-racial, and inter-cultural marriages, in that they 
normally go against the very community which marriage is designed to 
establish." 4

Rushdoony's condemnation of inter-racial marriage appears to have been his own 
and unrelated to the biblical text. It was not shared by other 
Reconstructionists.
 
bullet  Reconstructionists regard the Gods and Goddesses of all other religions 
to be "the devil," and their teachings to be false. They would attempt to 
replace all religions with their version of Christianity. For example, David 
Chilton wrote about Judaism:

    "The god of Judaism is the devil. The Jew will not be recognized by God as 
one of His chosen people until he abandons his demonic religion and returns to 
the faith of his fathers--the faith which embraces Jesus Christ and His 
Gospel." 5

Of course, there exists diversity of opinion within the Reconstructionist 
movement. Not all followers will necessarily agree with all the above 
statements of the movement's leaders

horizontal rule
Practices:

If they gained control of the US or Canadian federal government, there would be 
many changes:
--
The use of the death penalty would be greatly expanded, when the Hebrew 
Scriptures' laws are reapplied. People will be executed for adultery, 
blasphemy, heresy, homosexual behavior, idolatry, prostitution, evil sorcery 
(some translations say Witchcraft), etc. The Bible requires those found guilty 
of these "crimes" to be either stoned to death or burned alive. 
Reconstructionists are divided on the execution method to be used.

A church or congregation which does not accept the Mosaic Law has another god 
before them, and is thus guilty of idolatry. That would be punishable by death. 
That would include all non-Christian religious organizations. At the present 
time, non-Christians total two-thirds of the human race.

The status of women would be reduced to almost that of a slave as described in 
the Hebrew Scriptures. A woman would initially be considered the property of 
her father; after marriage, she would be considered the property of her husband.
bullet  It would be logical to assume that the institution of slavery would be 
reintroduced, and regulated according to Biblical laws. Fathers could sell 
their daughters into slavery. Female slaves would retain that status for life. 
Slave owners would be allowed to physically abuse them, as long as the slaves 
lived for at least a day before dying of the beating. 9

Polygyny and the keeping of concubines were permitted in the Old Testament. 
However, Reconstructionists generally believe in marriage between one man and 
one woman only. Any other sexual expression would be a capital crime. Those 
found guilty of engaging in same-sex, pre-marital or extra-marital sex would be 
executed.
bullet  The Old Testament "Jubilee Year" system would be celebrated once more. 
Every 50 years, the control of all land reverted to its original owners. In 
theory, this would require every part of North American land to be returned to 
the original Aboriginal owners (or perhaps to those persons of Aboriginal 
descent who are now Christians). Hawaii would be given back to the native 
Hawaiians.

Governments would all have balanced budgets.

Income taxes would be eliminated.

The prison system would be eliminated. A system of just restitution would be 
established for some crimes. The death penalty would be practiced for many 
other crimes. There would be little need for warehousing of convicted criminals.

Legal abortions would be banished; those found to be responsible for abortions 
would be charged with murder and executed.

The reinstitution of slavery appears to be a hot button item among 
Reconstructionists. We have received a few negative E-mails which complained 
that the movement does not recommend the resumption of human slavery. But we 
have received many more Emails from Reconstructionists claiming that legalizing 
slavery would be good for North America.

Joseph Busche and Bill Curry have written a Tennessee Law Book. Their intent 
was to show that laws to implement various Old Testament laws would sound 
extremely intrusive today. See: http://www.sullivan-county.com/.
--

And this is one of the milder interpretations of the dominionist aims. They 
really do make the taliban look reasonable.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:286293
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to