> RoMunn wrote: > For what, exactly? I am on the record as saying I really don't care that > they waterboarded KSM and other top Al Qaeda members, and I am generally OK > with the warrantless wiretapping program, though if evidence comes to light > that it was used for something other than terror-related surveillance, I > would be open to prosecutions of the people involved. >
Prosecute who for what? Your point is that you favor giving the government unlimited unchecked power, but, oh, we can back and prosecute them (under what) with the evidence that we got where and from whom? I find it hilarious that the modern Rush Limbaugh Right - like you - consider government a great and wonderful thing when it comes to the military and their power over citizens. But if you want government to build a bridge? Commies! Look up Goldwater. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:290347 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
