how can it not be a framework? I can write Fusebox 4 procedurally or OO, I could use mvc or not, I could use custom tags or cfcs, and I consider that a framework. You might say, well, CF is a language....but is it really or is it more of a DSL specialized for web applications...almost like a "Framework" :)
In essence though, aren't all web frameworks procedural? Sure, they can have some aspects of OO about them, but at the very heart they respond to requests in a procedural fashion. On Jun 11, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Judah McAuley wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Scott Stroz<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> cfml is not a framework..sorry...not even close >> > > Agreed, cfml is not a framework. As evidenced by the fact that you can > write cfml procedurally or OO, you can do everything in custom tags, > you can mix presentation and business logic or separate them, on and > on. > As if freedom was a question of might As if loyalty was black and white You hear people say it all the time- "My country wrong or right" I want to know what that's got to do With what it takes to find out what's true With everyone from the President on down Trying to keep it from you ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:298313 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
