If you really cannot see that cfml is not a framework, not really sure anything I can say will change your mind.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < [email protected]> wrote: > > how can it not be a framework? I can write Fusebox 4 procedurally or > OO, I could use mvc or not, I could use custom tags or cfcs, and I > consider that a framework. You might say, well, CF is a > language....but is it really or is it more of a DSL specialized for > web applications...almost like a "Framework" :) > > > In essence though, aren't all web frameworks procedural? Sure, they > can have some aspects of OO about them, but at the very heart they > respond to requests in a procedural fashion. > > > > > On Jun 11, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Judah McAuley wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Scott Stroz<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> cfml is not a framework..sorry...not even close > >> > > > > Agreed, cfml is not a framework. As evidenced by the fact that you can > > write cfml procedurally or OO, you can do everything in custom tags, > > you can mix presentation and business logic or separate them, on and > > on. > > > > As if freedom was a question of might > As if loyalty was black and white > You hear people say it all the time- > "My country wrong or right" > I want to know what that's got to do > With what it takes to find out what's true > With everyone from the President on down > Trying to keep it from you > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:298316 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
