To me, that makes your suggestion unfair. If we should penalize someone for smoking, why not penalize for genetic predisposition if they both carry equal possibility of contracting a disease? What about people who work in high risk jobs, such as coal miners, should they be penalized as well?
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Scott wrote: > > > > But, the guy with the healthy lifestyle, if genetically ore-disposed, may > > actually be more likely to get cancer. Should he then pay the higher > > premium? > > > > No > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:298743 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
