yeah... I can tell he's never had a medical bill for $45,000.... On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Michael Grant<[email protected]> wrote: > > I tend to wonder if Gruss would have this same opinion if the silver spoon > in his mouth was tarnished a tad. > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> To me, that makes your suggestion unfair. If we should penalize someone for >> smoking, why not penalize for genetic predisposition if they both carry >> equal possibility of contracting a disease? >> What about people who work in high risk jobs, such as coal miners, should >> they be penalized as well? >> >> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> > > Scott wrote: >> > > >> > > But, the guy with the healthy lifestyle, if genetically ore-disposed, >> may >> > > actually be more likely to get cancer. Should he then pay the higher >> > > premium? >> > > >> > >> > No >> > >> > >> >> > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:298753 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
