But that is not inequality either. You are conflating equality with sameness.

The Rooney rule says that you have to interview at least one minority
candidate. Doesn't say you have to hire a minority candidate. If the
management is set on a particular dude, the outcome is not in doubt.
If they are set on a minority guy, then a minority guy is going to
interview and get the job. If the management is set on a white dude,
they'll interview a white dude and a minority guy and then the white
dude will still get the job. If the outcome is predetermined, then the
process is largely moot but does still have the benefit of providing
experience for the guys who interview but don't get the job.

Where the rule does come into play is in situations where the
management is not already set on someone. If the situation is such
that the process matters, then the Rooney rule makes it so that at
least some non-white dude makes it into the process. And by getting
minority coaches into interviews, talking to owners and GMs, etc, they
start becoming taken more seriously, they gain experience and become
more likely to become head coaches.

It is true that the Rooney rule allows for the possibility that every
single interview for a coaching position might be non-white. We might
be able to reword the rule so that it treats racial diversity in the
interview process in such a way that it doesn't set up a white versus
non-white paradigm but instead mandates that at least one candiate not
be of the same race as all the others or something. But you know what?
That's not an issue.

You are kevetching about some theoretical disparity that might
possibly happen under the Rooney rule. The Rooney rule was put in
place because of *actual real disparity*. Not some theoretical shit.
If we start running into situations where white dudes are being denied
opportunities for head coaching jobs in the NFL because of their race,
lets revisit. But that ain't happening.

Judah

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Scott Stroz<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The problem I see with affirmative action, or other type
> programs/philosophies (such as the Rooney Rule in the NFL) is a simple
> one:
>
> If it is wrong for one person not to get a job solely because they are
> black/hispanic/asian/etc, it should also be wrong for me not to get a
> job solely because I am not black/hispanic/asian/etc.
>
> For those who do not know, the Rooney Rule states that for any
> management position on an NFL Team (such as head coach, general
> manager, defensive coordinator, etc) the team MUST interview at least
> one minority candidate. However, they are not required to interview a
> 'non minority' candidate.  So, if they interview a white guy and they
> know he is the guy they want, they have to interview someone else who
> is a minority, but if they interview a minority and they know he is
> the guy they want, they can just hire him and not interview anyone
> else - that is not equality.
>
> The way to get to equality is not to exhibit the same behavior against
> the majority that which you fought to end against the minority.
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Gruss Gott<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> RoMunn wrote:
>>> Do you really suck at U.S. history that much?
>>
>> I do.
>>
>>
>>> As for the "system of the father", I personally want all Americans have the
>>> opportunity to make good lives for themselves, provide for their families,
>>> and see their children do better than they did. That's what America is all
>>> about.
>>>
>>
>> It is, but it used to be MUCH easier for whitemale than everyone else.
>>
>> That will soon no longer be the case and that's why it's threatening.
>>
>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:300554
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to