On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, morgan l<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I suppose my point was that the whole idea of the PEO is that they can
> negotiate better premiums from the carriers, but that doesn't seem to be the
> case when put into practice.
> Insurance rates are definitely the problem. If insurance were affordable,
> fewer people would have to choose food and shelter over coverage. Sure, some
> people would still choose to be uninsured, but fewer would be put into the
> situation of having to choose to be uninsured. The current state of affairs
> does not allow me to shop for a competing rate vs what my employer (the PEO,
> actually) offers. Lack of competition helps keep the prices up. We need a
> competitive marketplace for coverage.
See, I can agree with this, which is sorta Gruss's line of reasoning,
but somehow different.
Maybe it's because regulation comes in many forms? Eh.
> -one more New Years' resolution out the window. I made it over half way
> through August before getting sucked into one of these threads. Maybe next
> year.
Ha! Not bad tho. More than half-way, neh? High two-and-a-half!
--
Blessed is the man who, having nothing to say, abstains from giving
wordy evidence of the fact.
George Eliot
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:302307
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
