But, what if my answers are yes, yes and no...or...no, yes, no....or no, no, yes...this is all too confusing.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Gruss Gott<[email protected]> wrote: > >> RoMunn wrote: >> >> My fear, to follow Scott's thought on medicare reimbursement, is that >> we will artificial price controls on the market if everyone is forced >> into a similar system. >> > > Government price controls NEVER work. That's why France is looking to > us - US! - for THEIR heading-to-bankruptcy system. > > All ya gotta do is ask yourself 3 questions: > > (1.) Should government be a producer and provider of consumer good and > services? > > (2.) Does government have a great track record of managing the tax payer > dollar? > > (3.) Has government proven itself superior to the private market in > efficiency and price controls? > > My answers? No, no, and no. So my reform is to put consumers back in > front of pricing and to finance health care the same way we finance > everything else: privately. With, of course, safety nets in place. > And we make it mandatory like home or car insurance. > > If one's answers are yes, yes, yes then that person should support > single-payer Medicare-for-all. > > In other words, there's really no reason to support the Frankenstein > "public option" and that why Obama is having such a tough time > articulating it. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:302498 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
