> Scott wrote:
>
> Since when did facts ever enter into any of our  discussions here?  Kill joy.
>

Welp, here are some damn good speculations:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-08-24/why-the-lockerbie-bomber-was-freed/

Nobody has yet proved that the British government struck a deal with
Tripoli—the return of the bomber for lucrative contracts with the
oil-rich Libyans—but the circumstantial evidence that something was
going on behind the scenes is growing daily. There is a bad smell in
London that no amount of official spin can dissipate—and the cast of
characters that might have been involved in any deal would not be out
of place in a Bond movie.

Two British prime ministers, the son of the Libyan dictator, a Russian
oligarch, the scion of a European banking dynasty, a prince of the
Realm, a leader of Big Oil and Britain’s very own “Prince of
Darkness”—all have at least walk on parts, if not more, in events that
preceded the release of the Lockerbie bomber, supposedly on
compassionate grounds (because he is apparently dying of prostate

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:302544
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to