in all fairness to Rumsfeld ( wasn't he the guy that got jumped on for using
those terms?)  those are actual meaningful terms of art in the field of
project management I do agree with what you are saying, but that is not the
best example. It may sound like gibberish but it's not.

Not, mind you that Rumsfeld deserves fairness, or maybe come to think if it
he does. Fairness would see him rotting in a dark cell for years on end,
periodically doused with ice water and denied a blanket while speaker blare
:Highway to Hell."

Fair would be treating him like the Eichamnn he is and shipping him off to
the Hague to answer for being such a pendant with the lives of others.

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Michael Grant<[email protected]> wrote:
> > Well from an outsider's (non-US) perspective [...] Instead
> > all we got was double speak about "known knowns" and "known
> > unknowns" and "unknown unknowns" etc.
>
> If that's really all you ever heard I would seriously consider
> investigating some new sources of news.
>
> Certainly Obama's team is far superior at communicating, but your
> broad generalization is not entirely accurate.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:303322
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to