It really isn't the same system. Take a look at the two articles I linked to. They are specialized in this area and give you details that get confused in main stream reports. You could also believe Bruce since I wouldn't presume to ask you to believe me :)
Different missile systems, different technology, targeted at different kinds of threats. Judah On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > It looks like the same system. > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6720153.stm > > They added Poland and Czech... to fill the gap in the defense. > > So what I'm getting here is we dissed Poland to please Russia on the > belief Iran doesn't and won't have long range missiles. > > Why on the 70th anniversary? Coincidence? > > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> That is referring to the system in Alaska. The decision yesterday >> doesn't seem to change anything about the development of the system in >> Alaska which is designed to combat long range missiles from Russia. >> >> The new system is ostensibly about defending Europe from missiles from >> Iran and N. Korea, which would be a different class of missile and >> require a different type of defense. Hence the change in strategy and >> equipment. >> >> Judah >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:304554 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
