> MoJo wrote: > >> A predictive framework that's stood for 100 years is as close to fact >> as anything can be. In other words, evolution is a fact. Period. > >The global warming example you mentioned is more the kind of thing I was >thinking about...
Ha! Absolutely - we certainly don't have a predictive weather theory! The odd thing to me about the science vs. religion chestnut is that usually it's only done for 2 reasons: (1.) Because people who aren't *religious* would like to influence those who are, or (2.) Because people who *are* religious need a bump to their faith. Yet neither of groups usually seem to be aware of their motivations. Science simply attempts to qualify and quantify what's around us. What created it all is still unknown; could been God or pink unicorns or who knows. That's where faith comes in. Whatever you might think created all this - for every single human - a matter of faith. I mean have you ever met ANYONE who doesn't have a thought about where all this stuff came from? I haven't. So in that sense you would think we would all agree. The fact that we don't is weir ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:306542 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
